I think that it works really good. It helps you to kinda see what she wants to say. I mean did you read this article it was very hard to read and kinda boring. So with the pics and highlighted areas it sorta broke up where your eyes would focus between text and the text in the pics. I thought that it worked.
I think its like bernhart says because you dont want to muck that would make it more cartoonist so to speak. With low text visual she keeps it more professional
Yes beauty is the eye of the beholder. Not eveyone has thesame taste in art or what ever the subject is. No I dont agree with Kant not all things are universally beautifull. Somethings that I like there are probably 10 othe people who dont loke it. So how can that be universalor inherently beautiful. Well I guess I already answered the last part just now.
I think that it says to get a good idea acrross that yiu need good visual composition wheter it be good or bad publicity. Bad publicity is still publicity.
Yes. Take Playboy for example some people would say that it is art. That the beauty of the female body is a canvas all its own. Where others who might be offended might think of this as pornography that they are just exploiting women.
No comments:
Post a Comment